Scott McClellan “hating on” Bush in his new book

LOL, I just love it when people act like they had nothing to do with a terrible situation when they were right in the midst of of. Scott…you were one of the main talking heads…the HEAD talking head when it came to the media. Now…years later you want to tell the truth? Well…thanks buddy! Thanks for lying to us and then writing about it. $$$ellout. Are you donating any of your book sales to veterans of the Iraq war?

Note to all you Politicos: Don’t tell the truth on the backend, be a whistle blower and help your fellow Americans. I’m sorry but blaming Bush is like blaming a 5 year old who’s mom dresses him funny. Sure he might want to wear that red and white stripped long sleeve shirt and pea green and orange pants, but mom and dad are supposed to bring guidance and direction. It’s a team effort.

Steve Holland / Reuters WASHINGTON – Former White House press secretary Scott McClellan charges in an explosive new book that President George W. Bush shaded the truth and manipulated public opinion to make the case for the “unnecessary” Iraq war.

McClellan, the first Bush insider to write a book criticizing his former boss and fellow Texan, drew instant condemnations on Wednesday from former White House colleagues who wondered why he stayed on the job.

“If he thinks he’s going to ingratiate himself to his critics, he’s sorely mistaken, and unfortunately, the only friends he had, he just lost,” said Dan Bartlett, who served as White House counselor.

McClellan, in “What Happened — Inside the Bush White House and Washington’s Culture of Deception,” presents himself as a one-time true Bush believer who mistakenly fell in line behind “the campaign to sell the war” in Iraq.

McClellan, who had argued strenuously from the White House podium on why the war was justified, wrote that the decision to go to war in Iraq was a “fateful misstep.”

“What I do know is that war should only be waged when necessary, and the Iraq war was not necessary,” he said.

McClellan called Bush “a man of personal charm, wit, and enormous political skill,” and “plenty smart enough to be president,” while sprinkling criticism of him throughout the 341-page book.

Bush led a “carefully orchestrated campaign to shape and manipulate sources of public approval to our advantage” to get Americans behind the war.”

His operating style, said McClellan, was to remain “continually in campaign mode, never explaining, never apologizing, never retreating. Unfortunately, that strategy also had less justifiable repercussions: never reflecting, never reconsidering, never compromising. Especially where Iraq was concerned.”

McClellan was replaced as White House press secretary in 2006 by Tony Snow, and Snow gave way to Dana Perino about a year ago.

Many in the White House were stunned by the book. Perino blasted McClellan.

“Scott, we now know, is disgruntled about his experience at the White House. For those of us who fully supported him, before, during and after he was press secretary, we are puzzled. It is sad — this is not the Scott we knew,” she wrote in an e-mail to reporters.

“The book, as reported by the press, has been described to the president. I do not expect a comment from him on it — he has more pressing matters than to spend time commenting on books by former staffers,” she said.

The Iraq war was fought over charges that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction, which were never found. Bush began building the case for war in 2002 after the upheaval caused by the September 11, 2001, attacks.

McClellan, in a chapter called “Selling the War,” said Bush and his top aides did not think through the implications of the conflict.

He said Bush and aides did not employ out-and-out deception, but rather participated in “shading the truth, downplaying the major reason for going to war and emphasizing a lesser motivation that could arguably be dealt with in other ways (such as intensified diplomatic pressure).”

Bush, at the U.S. Air Force Academy in Colorado, ignored the book and instead sought Americans’ patience for the prolonged wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

But former McClellan associates were livid.

“Here’s a guy who rode the president’s coattails to the world stage and now is (urinating) on his political grave, all the way to the bank,” said former White House deputy press secretary Trent Duffy.

Bartlett said McClellan was drawing broad conclusions from decisions in meetings that he did not attend. In the run-up to the war, McClellan was a deputy press secretary dealing with domestic affairs.

“Whatever misgivings Scott now proclaims to have, he never shared with anybody, publicly or privately with his closest friends in the White House, which can only leave you scratching your head about the timing of a book right before the president leaves office,” Bartlett said.

Former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer said he was “heartbroken and stumped” by the book.

“If Scott felt this, why didn’t he ever come to me privately and express it, or why did he take the press secretary job if he thought the president and the White House were disseminating propaganda,” Fleischer said.

McClellan had harsh words for many of the president’s team. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was deft at protecting her reputation “even when the problems related to matters under her direct purview,” he wrote.

Former Bush adviser Karl Rove was “the kind of person who would be willing, in the heat of battle, to push the envelop to the limit of what is permissible ethically or legally,” McClellan wrote.

3 Comments

Filed under drama, government, news, opinion, politics, washington

3 Responses to Scott McClellan “hating on” Bush in his new book

  1. NB

    Sorry to hate on your post, but you’re not right on this. His job as press secretary was to saw what they wanted him to say. That was his job. He’d get fired if he said anything but what Bush’s daddy’s friends wanted him to say. He is in no position to challenge anything. More power to him by committing career suicide with a sweet tell-all book deal.

  2. I doubt he had a problem performing the job because it was a means to the end he wanted. And now he is benefiting again. Instead of writing a book, if he really had an issue he’d be doing something proactive to end the war or help the soldiers who are fighting over there right now. Instead of going on a PR campaign for his book, he should be heading over to Iraq.

  3. NB, You have a right to your opinion. np

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>