On the news last night I noticed a lot of commentators and pundits were discussing the 14th amendment all willy nilly. Um…was anyone else uncomfortable with the dialogue. I don’t want to wake up tomorrow and hear that I’m not a citizen. Don’t follow me…
Background: Anderson Cooper’s show offers the rundown of what’s being tossed about in the halls of Capitol Hill.
Republicans such as Sens. Lindsey Graham, John Kyl and John Cornyn are tripping over themselves to jump on the latest “Dumb Way to Solve the Illegal Immigration Problem” bus by suggesting Congress examine repealing the 14th Amendment, which deals with one way of becoming a U.S. citizen.
The far right has latched onto the idea that the provision in question – which grants citizenship to children born in the U.S. – is being abused by illegal immigrants who choose to come to America to have their children, thus worsening the illegal immigration problem.
Some are even trying to suggest that how it is being used today is counter to the original intent of the Founding Fathers.
Of course, the 14th Amendment was not in the first U.S. Constitution as drawn up by our framers. It was adopted on July 9, 1868, to prevent Southern states from denying citizenship to former slaves and their children, since they didn’t choose to come to America. They were brought here for the purpose of the vicious and dehumanizing free-labor plan that helped build the nation – slavery.
There were no immigration laws as we know them in 1868 so this is just crazy talk.
The problem is enforcement of the existing laws. The 14th amendment can’t change anything that the government is not going to enforce. The problem in my opinion is that we have neglected our own immigration laws and the enforcement of them for so long that now the elephant in the room is that there are millions of people who would have to be rounded up for the law to really be followed to the letter. Many of these people have children who are by law American citizens. Combine this with the fact that we’ve allowed whole industries to benefit from the labor of persons who are in this country illegally. If all of the “illegal” aliens were forced to leave, the impact would be felt on various levels of our society.
In addition, NO ONE is going to take away the 14th. One good reason? All the Italian, German, Russian, and other european immigrants who came to these shores. You see, no one is going to want to have to prove that their great, great grandma from England or Cicely became a citizen naturally. Remember people, we are a nation of foreigners. The only people who’ve “been” here are the Native Americans.
Filed under african american, black history, change, civil rights, culture, government, history, news, opinion, politics, race
A C-SPAN clip of SEIU Executive Vice President Gerry Hudson is circulating online. In it he says something controversial about how one can move African-Americans to care more about immigration reform.
“On white workers, I think we got some real problems. I’ve spent a lot of time in Wisconsin and places like that, where I have heard some of the most anti-immigrant sentiments around. It’s also, and this is where you get the black workers first, it’s so f***ing rabidly racist, ’til black people get scared. They don’t just mean you, right? So, you can organize them quicker, like, look at what’s there.”
A number of right-wing themed sites are pushing this clip viral. They seem to think that he’s calling black people gullible and that he’s demonizing good, working class white folk. Hudson is a big, black, bald-headed man. The fact that he cussed alone likely made some people uncomfortable. LOL
It’s no secret the rhetoric that follows immigration reform can be laced with images and concepts that make blacks and jews very uncomfortable. Racial profiling is what it is, but any thought of laws that require people to have proper documentation…makes me think of South Africa. If you suggest racist motives and connect with the black experience of American racism…sure, you’ll motivate some people.
However, there is also an economic and social side (access to social services and the strain on local governments) to immigration reform that blacks may have concerns over. Let’s face it, some black people are as concerned as some whites with the idea of Hispanics “taking over” America. Just ask someone who grew up in Dade County or Miami Florida about needed to be bi-lingual to get a job. I’m not saying that it’s right…I’m just saying.
Readers, take a look for yourself and tell me what you think.
What do you think about African-American and Online Dating? What has been your experience? Would you recommend it to your friends? Do you think that it would open up multi-cultural options for single Black women? What are your thoughts?
My Opinion: I’ve tried a number of dating sites in the past. EHarmony was the worst. I suggest the recruit more African-Americans and other ethnicities for balance. They could consider creating a campaign targeting African-Americans that plays on the “Christian values” part of their market. A lot of holy rollers looking for love would go for that. I’ve heard that BlackPeopleMeet is pretty bad in terms of people acting like they are on Craigslist’s Casual Encounters. As an African-American woman, I found my overall online dating experiences lacking. I’m someone who wanted a real relationship and not just something casual. However, I came to believe that you have to lower your expectations when you’re dating online because 1) People lie (and post old photos), 2) Married people and people who should be allowed to date are trolling on these sites (check out dontdatehimgirl.com) and 3) Online dating doesn’t bring out the best in everyone.
Something to consider: In the past, Gallup polls have shown that half of all Black Americans believe it’s “very important” for couples to marry when they have a child — yet according to research from Packaged Facts, more than six out of ten Black Americans are unmarried, thereby making that group the most unattached in America.
Oh Wow. RACIST!! I want to thank Think Progress for posting this. This is some straight BS! If you are a black person living in AZ you need to campaign really, really hard to get this man out of office. Here’s the info:
Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ) — one of the most conservative member of Congress, according to a new National Journal ranking — decried the strained state of political discourse in an interview today with blogger-activist Mike Stark. While defending hate radio host Rush Limbaugh, Franks said bipartisanship and “true tolerance” is about “being halfway decent to each other in spite of the differences.” But when the conversation turned to abortion, Franks made a clearly indecent comment, claiming that African-Americans were probably better off under slavery than they are today:
FRANK: In this country, we had slavery for God knows how long. And now we look back on it and we say “How brave were they? What was the matter with them? You know, I can’t believe, you know, four million slaves. This is incredible.” And we’re right, we’re right. We should look back on that with criticism. It is a crushing mark on America’s soul. And yet today, half of all black children are aborted. Half of all black children are aborted. Far more of the African-American community is being devastated by the policies of today than were being devastated by policies of slavery. And I think, What does it take to get us to wake up?
What? Huh? Don’t believe me? Watch it (beginning 6:20):
Franks continued by saying, “[S]ometimes we get angry and say things that we shouldn’t say, and I apologize…[for saying things] that are intemperate. But I don’t want to hide from the truth.”
Truth? Readers, is this the truth? AZ, is this the truth that you want your Representatives to believe in?
Update: Salon.com has picked up the story. They report this: Abortion-rights opponents like to compare abortion and slavery; the Dred Scott vs. Sandford case is often seen on the right as the 19th century equivalent of Roe v. Wade. Still, the comments caught the attention of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
“To compare the horrors and inhumane treatment of millions of African Americans during slavery as a better way of life for African Americans today is beyond repulsive,” said Stephanie Young, a DCCC spokeswoman. “In 2010, during the 2nd year of our first African American president, it is astonishing that a thought such as this would come to mind, let alone be shared. The next time Congressman Franks wants to make assumptions about what policies are ‘best’ for the African American community, he should keep them to himself.” [Full Article]
Filed under african american, black, black men, black women, hate, history, news, opinion, politics, race, racism, slavery, white folks
NPR is reporting that the US Census has slipped up and put “Negro” on the 2010 form. You guys know that I have a special place in my heart for this word (see the title of this blog). They claim they added it because some older African-Americans wrote it on the form in previous years. Really? I need to call Mother Dear and tell her not to do that. It’s 2010. I wonder if they actually considered adding in “colored” as well.
Census Bureau, do you really have to think about these things? Really!?!? DC is a few min away from their Suitland MD offices. I might need to send a letter or something.
I’m not surprised. I think someone may have been lashing out in a form of anti-Obama style protest. It reminds me of when that artist put a penis in the art work of the Little Mermaid VHS cover. Here’s the sccop from NPR.Org
Photo: From the 2010 questionaire. (Census.gov)
By Mark Memmott, NPR.org
The Census Bureau says it has included “Negro” as a way for individuals to classify their race in the 2010 Census because some older African-Americans wrote it on their forms in 2000.
But many African-Americans find it insulting.
– “It’s almost like a slap in the face,” Nikyle Fitzgerald tells WTOL in Toledo.
– “I am a little offended,” Dawud Ingram says to WCBS-TV.
– “It’s a bad vibe word,” Kevin Bishop says in the New York Daily News.
We’ve asked Census for some historical background on when the word has been used in the past. We’ll update with that information.
Barack Obama didn’t take a dig at pop star Jessica Simpson! And I’m so glad he didn’t. However, this story is making it’s rounds…Quickly.
The remark came at the end of the President Obama’s interview with NBC Sunday, when interviewer Matt Lauer held up a copy of the latest US Magazine, which features first lady Michelle Obama along with daughters Sasha and Malia. On the left side of the cover was a picture of Simpson, whom the magazine said is in a “weight battle.”
Lauer noted the magazine had replaced the president’s spot in the family photo with the Simpson headline.
“You got replaced by Jessica Simpson,” Lauer said.
“Yeah, who’s losing a weight battle apparently,” Obama said, according to the network’s interview transcript, sparking a firestorm online. “Yeah. Oh, well.”
But the transcript misquoted the president who visibly only re-read the magazine’s headline that Lauer was holding up — “She’s in a ‘weight battle,’ apparently” — and did not say that Simpson was “losing” that fight.
I think Obama should prepare to be misquoted over and over. If he had said that, I would blame it on classic black sarcasm. You know black folk can talk about you to your face and you would not know. “Oh girl, those shoes are nice *roll your eyes*” Raise your hand if you’re guilty.
Watch this video and here what Brothers have to say about the matter (from CNN’s Special Reports area of the “Black in America” site.
FYI: They also posted this great article on one sista’s singleness http://www.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/wayoflife/07/22/single.black.women/
Filed under african american, black man, black men, black women, community, dating, history, interracial, love, race, relationships, women
This article brings up a good question for our discussion this friday.
HAS OBAMA ADDRESSED BLACK ISSUES? by CASH MICHAELS
The Wilmington Journal
Beyond the need for the black family to be strengthened, and errant black fathers in struggling inner cities to help rear their children, has Sen. Barack Obama addressed other serious policy issues specific to the African-American community, or has he, as Rev. Jesse Jackson has suggested, engaged only in “talking down to blacks”?
The answer can be found on YouTube (www.youtube.com), the popular Internet video site, where a four-part, “Obama w/Black Press” video of the Democratic presumptive presidential nominee speaking to publishers and reporters with the NC Black Publishers Association (NCBPA) three months ago can be found (go to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1NA4T0F-rU to view).
Taped April 29 at the Lawrence Joel Coliseum Annex in Winston-Salem, NC by The Carolinian/Wilmington Journal newspapers before his crucial May 6 primary victory against then Democratic rival Sen. Hillary Clinton, Obama, who was accompanied by renowned historian Dr. John Hope Franklin, delved head-on into critical issues such as affordable healthcare; civil rights enforcement and criminal justice; the importance of early childhood education; restructuring the Small Business Administration to help African-American, women-owned and other small enterprises; job opportunities, the mortgage meltdown; rising energy prices and more…Full Article
Filed under african american, black, black man, community, media, news, obama, opinion, politics, race, youtube
CNN is doing a whole lot of promotion and creating a lot activity around their “Black in America” series. I’m glad to see it. They’ve even teamed up with Essence Magazine for a special report,
“Abortion. Gay marriage. Immigration. For years we have debated these issues behind closed doors. Now GOP strategists are selling such subjects to us as the greatest threats to African-Americans, seizing on the conventional wisdom that we are politically liberal yet socially conservative. As 2008 approaches, we asked Black America’s keenest minds to weigh in on the real pressing issues we will need to deal with in the coming year.” [Click here for what they had to say]
What do you have to say as an African American on the subjects of abortion, gay marriage, and immigration?
I think Hillary Clinton would benefit from watching this series in light of her recent comments. It’s a great video and really gave me some interesting incite on how white people perceive [or don't perceive] white privilege.
“Mirrors of Privilege: Making Whiteness Visible is a brilliant documentary and a must-see for all people who are interested in justice, spiritual growth and community making. It features the experiences of white women and men who have worked to gain insight into what it means to challenge notions of racism and white supremacy in the United States.”
Filed under academic, african american, black men, black women, change, community, interracial, opinion, race, slavery, society, video, white folks, youtube